Q3 2010 KPI’s

Q3, 2010 KPI’s reveal a continued growth in the quality of newly acquired operators…

Here are the quarterly KPI’s for April/May/June of 2010.

While the pace of Operator Acquisition has slowed, Acquisition Quality is at record highs, and operators continue to redeem a greater number of products from more Sponsors. As it has in past quarters, retention remains on our watch list and win-backs remain steady.

Tagged with:
 

1st Quarter 2010 KPI’s

1st Quarter 2010 KPI’s continue to show strength…

Here are the quarterly KPI’s for January/February/March of 2010.

Some highlights: Enrollment remains strong, operator activity in the first 30 days is at near-record highs, operators continue to redeem more products from more Sponsors, retention remains on our watch list and win-backs remain steady.

 

2009 in Review

The year in review statistics and 4th quarter KPI’s continue to show growth despite a tough economic environment…

Sponsors, Operators, and Foodservice Rewards staff worked well together last year and the resulting 2009 4th Quarter KPI’s are holding steady despite a tough economic environment.

  • Labels: BI shipped 86,819,377 labels to 237 manufacturers’ plants in North America.
  • Redemptions: 75,523 operators redeemed 17,373,324 cases – that’s a 5% increase in cases and a 6% increase in operators over 2008 – and just shy of 50,000 codes per day.
  • Promotions: Sponsors ran 167 promotions – a 55% increase over last year. ALL Sponsors ran at least one promotion during the year – a first perfect season – and the average promotion resulted in 8,436 incremental cases being redeemed by 1,116 operators with an ROI of 167%.
  • Customer Service : Our customer care team handled 14,809 calls and emails.
  • Special Requests: The Operations Team ran 496 special reports. This number does not include the hundreds of reports provided by your Coalition Managers.
  • Tagged with:
     

    Q4, 2008 KPI’s

    The Q4, 2008 KPI’s reflect the economy’s broader malaise, albeit with some bright spots

    Included with this update are the latest quarterly metrics through December 31, 2008. Some highlights:

  • Enrollments are rebounding.
  • Activity 30 days after enrollment remains high.
  • Operators continue to redeem more product from more Sponsors.
  • Retention continues to be an issue.
  • Re-engagement remains steady.
  • Tagged with:
     

    2nd Quarter 2008 KPI’s

    Here are the 2nd quarter 2008 KPI’s in which we introduce a new measure winbacks

    Here are the standard Key Performance Indicators we’ve tracked for years, plus a new one: Progress with coaliton-wide winbacks attributable to our telemarketing efforts which we have expanded from three FTE’s to four (with additional two open positions to fill based on these results.)

     

    2008 First Quarter KPI’s

    Acquisition, engagement, and conversion continue to grow as evidenced by the Q1 2008 KPI’s…

    As you may be aware, we routinely publish our customer lifecycle KPI metrics as a way to publicly benchmark the coalition’s progress. Here the results from the first quarter of 2008. Highlights:

  • Over 30% of operators buy 11+ products from the coalition
  • 45% now buy from five+ sponsors demonstrating “the coalition effect”
  • Our win-back efforts are bearing fruit: See enrollment versus attrition #’s
  • Tagged with:
     

    Q4 2007 Metrics and Goals

    Q4 2007 KPI’s and Goals: an increased focus on engagement and retention…

    Progress progress progress, as reflected in our Q4 2007 Key Performance Indicators. While we’ve added more operators than ever before, it’s also time to increase our engagement and retention efforts. We’ll be supplementing our email communications to operators who haven’t entered a code in 60 days with an additional print campaign to be presented at the April sponsor meeting.

    Here’s a preview of our goals for the coming year. As a result of this update some have asked for further clarification of our policy on category exclusivity.

    You may recall from prior announcements and Sponsor Meeting discussions of the topic, Foodservice Rewards has not offered category exclusivity to new coalition members for over a year, nor is it available in coalitions launched in new countries, i.e. Australia. Furthermore, numerous categories are now non-exclusive and feature multiple branded sponsors, including Seafood, Soup, Dressings, Poultry, and Beef, to name a few. However, we will continue to exclude your brand’s biggest competitor: Distributor private label.

    The purpose of Foodservice Rewards is to establish a sustainable competitive barrier to “price” competition by providing an alternative to discounting. This is a brand equity building aproach – a “gift with purchase,” that reminds operators it is worth paying more for premium brands, especially when they come with rewards and recognition of that customer’s loyalty.

    I was recently reminded by Daryl Gormley of Sara Lee that operators have already figured out that everyone’s check averages and customer traffic benefit when multiple operators cluster in one location (even when they are competitors). That’s why you’ll often find a Panera, Starbucks, DQ, Chipotle, Chili’s, Noodles, Breugger’s, Subway, Domino’s and more at the same destination.

    Our aim in ending exclusivity as existing contracts expire is to do the same: Cause a rising tide that lifts all boats.

    Tagged with:
     

    Looking for something?

    Use the form below to search the site:

    Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us.

    Foodservice Marketing © 2002-2010 All Rights Reserved